APPLICABILITY OF THE AMES TEST AND MICRONUCLEUS TEST IN VIVO FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE EQUIVALENCE OF PESTICIDE TECHNICAL GRADE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS COMPARED TO ORIGINAL ACTIVE SUBSTANCES
Introduction. Analogs of pesticides may differ from the original products in their properties because of the elevated level or the modified composition of the impurities. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the equivalence of such analogs using a number of criteria, including mutagenicity, to ensure their safety. The article compares the results of the research of genotoxic effects of technical grade active ingredients of pesticides in vitro and in vivo conditions to assess the applicability of such methods for equivalence determination of analogs of pesticides to patented products. Material and methods. The genotoxicity of 99 technical grade active ingredients of pesticides (59 names) was studied in vitro (Ames test) and in vivo. Results. In the Ames test mutagenic dose-dependent effects were revealed in the study of technical products of mesotrione, dimethoate, and pendimethalin both in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system.In the in vivo test, a statistically significant dose-dependent increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatophilic erythrocytes in mouse bone marrow was detected after administration of six technical products mesotrione, pyrimiphos-methyl, dimethoate, glyphosate (2 products), isoproturon. Furthermore, different levels of genotoxic effects were found with technical materials of the same active ingredient from various productions, probably due to differences in the qualitative and quantitative composition of impurities. Conclusion. The present study indicated that in vitro and in vivo tests do not always demonstrate the same results of the genotoxicity assessment. Therefore, the use of only one bacterial reverse mutation test may not be sufficient to determine the equivalence of technical grade active ingredients of pesticides to the original active substances. To obtain а reliable evidence for the safe use of analogs of pesticides, it is necessary to usе at least two methods on different test objects.
About the authorsIlyushina Nataliya A.
Paptsov A.G., Popova A.G. The world market of chemical plant protection products and tendencies of its development. Agroprodovol’stvennaya politika Rossii. 2013; 11 (23): 104-7. (in Russian).
Manual on development and use of FAO and WHO specifications for pesticides. First edition - third revision March 2016. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246192/1/WHO-HTM-NTD-WHOPES-2016.4-eng.pdf
Guidance Document on the Assessment of the Equivalence of Technical Materials of Substances regulated under Rregulation (EC) No 1107/2009. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_guidance_equivalence-chem-substances_en.pdf
Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products, and the Environment. Interim guidance on a strategy for genotoxicity testing and mutagenic hazard assessment of impurities in chemical substances. 2012. COM/12/S2. 10 P. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/genotoxicity-assessment-of-impurities-in-chemical-substances.
Abilev S.K. Identification and prediction of mutagenic activity of chemical compounds of the environment. Abstract for the degree of Doctor of Biological Sciences. Moscow, 2003: 50 р. Available at: http://earthpapers.net/vyyavlenie-i-prognozirovanie-mutagennoy-aktivnosti-himicheskih-soedineniy-okruzhayuschey-sredy-1 (in Russian).
D. Kirkland, L. Reeve, D. Gatehouse, P.Vanparys. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. Mutat Res. 2011 Mar 18; 721 (1): 27-73. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.015.
Rakitskii V.N., Revazova Yu.A., Ilyushina N.A. Strategy and tactics of the pesticide mutagenicity assessment. Toksikologicheskij vestnik. 2015; 134 (5): 10-3. (in Russian).
Abilev S.K., Glaser V.M., Aslanian M.M. Fundamentals of mutagenesis and genotoxicology. The lecture: schoolbook. M., St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. 2012, 148 p. (in Russian).
Gireesh H. Kamath and K.S. Rao. Genotoxicity guidelines recommended by International conference of harmonization (ICH). In: Dhawan A.and Bajpayee M. (eds) Genotoxicity Assessment: Methods and Protocols, Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1044: 431-58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-529-3_24.
OECD, test 471:1997, IDT. Bacterial reverse mutation test.
Maron D.M., Bruce N. Ames. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation Research, 113 (1983) 173-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9
Mortelmans K., Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research. 2000; 455: 29-60. doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00064-6.
Guidelines on short-term methods for detection of mutagenic and cancerogenic chemicals. A Co-Publishing of United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour Organization and World Health Organization. M.: Meditsina, 1989: 26-38. (in Russian).
OECD Test No. 474: Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test, 2014.
Methodological guidelines. Assessment of mutagenic activity of pesticides (MU-1.2.3364-16). М. Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor: 2016 (in Russian).
Guidelines. Assessment of mutagenic activity of environmental factors in cells of different mammalian organs using the micronucleus method. Moscow: Interdepartmental Scientific Council on Human Ecology and Environmental Hygiene of the Russian Federation 2001. (in Russian).
McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. Generalized linear models. CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability 37. Second Edition. Chapman and Hall: London, New York, 1983: 261 p. doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710290217
McDonald J.H. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for repeated tests of independence. Handbook of Biological Statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, Maryland. 2014: 94-100 p. http://www.biostathandbook.com/cmh.html
Guideline OECD № 489 «In vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay», 2014.
FAO Specifications and Evaluations for Agricultural Pesticides. Glyphosate. N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/Specs/Glypho_2014.pdf
Kier L., Kirkland D. Review of genotoxicity studies of glyphosate and glyphosate-based formulations. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Apr; 43 (4): 283-315.
IARC Monographs Volume 112: Evaluation of five organophosphate insecticides and herbicides. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (March 20, 2015).
FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper. 229. Pesticide residues in food 2016. The Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues report 2016. World Health Organization Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Rue J.C., Kim K.-R. Evaluation of genetic toxicity of synthetic chemicals (VII) - a synthetic selective herbicide pendimethalin. J. Environ. Toxicol. 2003;18 (2): 121-9.
EPA USA. Pendimethalin. Human Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed Food Uses of the Herbicide on Artichoke, Globe; Asparagus; Brassica Head and Stem Vegetables, Subgroup 5A; and Grape (PP#6E7129). 2007. 34 p.
Health Effects Division EPA USA. Pendimethalin registration eligibility decision document. Review. 53 p.
Behera BC1, Bhunya SP. Genotoxic effect of isoproturon (herbicide) as revealed by three mammalian in vivo mutagenic bioassays. Indian J Exp Biol. 1990 Sep; 28 (9): 862-7.
European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Isoproturon. Sanco /849/2002. http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=activesubstance.ViewReview&id=68
Watson M. Dimethoate. Pesticides Safety Directorate. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, United Kingdom. http://www.inchem.org/documents/jmpr/jmpmono/v96pr05.htm
Review report for the active substance mesotrione. SANCO/1416/2001 - Final, April 2003 http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=activesubstance.ViewReview&id=350.
- Refbacks are not listed
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.