TOWARDS THE QUESTION OF «DOSE» MOTOR REHABILITATION AFTER STROKE: REVIEW

According to regulatory documents and published studies, the time in the hospital for rehabilitation after a stroke during one stage is 10-30 hours or more per patient. At the same time, a reliable assessment of the required volume of motor rehabilitation and motor training remains an actual and complex task, which requires special attention of researchers and consensus solutions in order to obtain clear justifications for choosing the type and mode of employment, and to improve the effectiveness of the measures taken.

Belagaje S.R. Stroke rehabilitation. Continuum (Minneap. Minn.). Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2017; 23(1): 238-253.

Damulin I.V., Ekusheva E.V. Clinical significance of the phenomenon of neuroplasticity in ischemic stroke. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2016; (1): 57-64. (In Russ.)

Dimyan M.A., Cohen L.G. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011; 7(2): 76-85.

Stöckel T., Carroll T.J., Summers J.J., Hinder M.R. Motor learning and cross-limb transfer rely upon distinct neural adaptation processes. J. Neurophysiol. 2016; 116(2): 575-86.

Selionov V.A., Solopova I.A., Zhvansky D.S. The activation of the interfacial bonds increases the motor output in the legs in healthy subjects: a study in conditions of unloading of hands and feet. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2016; 42(1): 52-63. (In Russ.)

Kubryak O.V., Kovaleva A.V., Gorbacheva A.K., Grokhovsky S.S., Biryukova E.A., Panova E.N. Peculiarities of achieving the result in a problem with a biological feedback on the reference reaction when the execution mode changes. Materials of the XXIII Congress of the Physiological Society named after I.P. Pavlova [Materialy XXIII s’ezda Fiziologicheskogo obshchestva imeni I.P. Pavlova]. Voronezh; 2017: 298-9. (In Russ.)

Lohse K.R., Lang C.E., Boyd L.A. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014; 45(7): 2053-8.

Moscow Consensus on the use of stabilometry and biofeedback for the reference reaction in practical public health and research / P.K. Anokhin Institute of Normal Physiology. Мoscow; 2017. http://moscowstabilometryconsensus.ru. (In Russ.)

Kotov S.V., Biryukova E.V., Turbina L.G., Kondur A.A., Zaitseva E.V. Dynamics of recovery in patients with post-stroke motor impairment during repeated courses of neurorehabilitation with exoskeleton of the brush controlled by the brain-computer interface. Zhurnal vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti im. I.P. Pavlova. 2017; 67(4): 445-52. (In Russ.)

Yastrebtseva I.P., Krivonogov V.A. Stabilometric training using biofeedback of different modalities: analysis of results. Doktor.Ru. 2018; (1): 16-20. (In Russ.)

Chernikova L.A. (ed.) Restorative neurology: innovative technologies in neurorehabilitation [Vosstanovitel’naya nevrologiya: innovatsionnyye tekhnologii v neyroreabilitatsii]. Мoscow; 2016: 61-122. (In Russ.)

Kubryak O.V., Krivoshey I.V. Analysis of the scientific field on the example of a review of dissertations. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny. 2016; (6): 52-68. (In Russ.)

Union of Rehabilitologists of Russia. Materials. The order of organization of medical rehabilitation. URL: https://rehabrus.ru/materialyi/poryadok-organizaczii-mediczinskoj-reabilitaczii-1705.html. (In Russ.)

White Book on physical and rehabilitation medicine in Europe. Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. Med. 2018; 54(2): 177-85.

Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. A Guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, 2016. URL: https://www.aan.com/Guidelines/Home/GetGuidelineContent/744.

Nudo R.J. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013; 7: 887.

Darling W.G., Morecraft R.J., Rotella D.L., Pizzimenti M.A., Ge J., Stilwell-Morecraft K.S. et al. Recovery of precision grasping after motor cortex lesion does not require forced use of the impaired hand in Macaca mulatta. Exp. Brain. Res. 2014; 232(12): 3929-38.

Taylor J., Macpherson T., Spears I., Weston M. The effects of repeated-sprint training on field-based fitness measures: a meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2015; 45(6): 881-91.

Peters D.M., McPherson A.K., Fletcher B., McClenaghan B.A., Fritz S.L. Counting repetitions: an observational study of video game play in people with chronic poststroke hemiparesis. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2013; 37(3): 105-11.

Lang C.E., Lohse K.R., Birkenmeier R.L. Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2015; 28(6): 549-55.

Reinkensmeyer D.J., Burdet E., Casadio M., Krakauer J.W., Kwakkel G., Lang C.E. et al. Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2016; 13(1): 42.

Lohse K.R., Schaefer S.Y., Raikes A.C., Boyd L.A., Lang C.E. Asking new questions with old data: The centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke. Front. Neurol. 2016; 7: 153.

Bernhardt J., Borschmann K., Boyd L., Thomas Carmichael S., Corbett D., Cramer S.C. et al. Moving rehabilitation research forward: Developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int. J. Stroke. 2016; 11(4): 454-8.

Walker M.F., Hoffmann T.C., Brady M.C., Dean C.M., Eng J.J., Farrin A.J. et al. Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int. J. Stroke. 2017; 12(5): 472-9.

Boyd L.A., Hayward K.S., Ward N.S., Stinear C.M., Rosso C., Fisher R.J. et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int. J. Stroke. 2017; 12(5): 480-93.

Kubryak O.V., Grokhovsky S.S., Isakova E.V., Kotov S.V. Biolo-gical feedback on the basic reaction: methodology and therapeutic aspects [Biologicheskaya obratnaya svyaz’ po opornoy reaktsii: metodologiya i terapevticheskiye aspekty]. Мoscow; 2015. (In Russ.)

Kubryak O.V., Panova E.N. Definition of the concepts of virtual reality in medical rehabilitation. Physiotherapy, balneology and rehabilitation. Fizioterapiya, bal’neologiya i reabilitatsiya. 2017. 16(2): 70-72. (In Russ.)

Corbetta D., Imeri F., Gatti R. Rehabilitation that incorporates virtual reality is more effective than standard rehabilitation for improving walking speed, balance and mobility after stroke: a systematic review. J. Physiother. 2015; 61(3): 117-24.

de Rooij I.J., van de Port I.G., Meijer J.G. Effect of virtual reality training on balance and gait ability in patients with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys. Ther. 2016; 96(12): 1905-18.

Chen L., Lo W.L., Mao Y.R., Ding M.H., Lin Q., Li H. et al. Effect of virtual reality on postural and balance control in patients with stroke: a systematic literature review. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016; 2016: 7309272.

Iruthayarajah J., McIntyre A., Cotoi A., Macaluso S., Teasell R. The use of virtual reality for balance among individuals with chronic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017; 24(1): 68-79.

Cheok G., Tan D., Low A., Hewitt J. Is Nintendo Wii an effective intervention for individuals with stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2015; 16(11): 923-32.

Bower K.J., Clark R.A., McGinley J.L., Martin C.L., Miller K.J. Clinical feasibility of the Nintendo Wii™ for balance training post-stroke: a phase II randomized controlled trial in an inpatient setting. Clin. Rehabil. 2014; 28(9): 912-23.

Clark R.A., Pua Y.H., Oliveira C.C., Bower K.J., Thilarajah S., McGaw R. et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control. Gait Posture. 2015; 42(2): 210-3.

Darekar A., McFadyen B.J., Lamontagne A., Fung J. Efficacy of virtual reality-based intervention on balance and mobility disorders post-stroke: a scoping review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2015; 12: 46.

Gibbons E.M., Thomson A.N., de Noronha M., Joseph S. Are virtual reality technologies effective in improving lower limb outcomes for patients following stroke - a systematic review with meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016; 23(6): 440-57.

Snopkov P.S., Lyadov K.V., Shapovalenko T.V., Sidyakina I.V. Remote rehabilitation: sources, condition, prospects. Fizioterapiya, bal’neologiya i reabilitatsiya. 2016. 15(3): 141-5. (In Russ.)

Lloréns R., Noé E., Colomer C., Alcañiz M. Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2015; 96(3): 418-25.

Squires R.W., Kaminsky L.A., Porcari J.P., Ruff J.E., Savage P.D., Williams M.A. Progression of exercise training in early outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: An official statement from the american association of cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2018; 38(3): 139-46.

WHO: Rehabilitation 2030: A call for action, 2017. URL: http://www.who.int/disabilities/care/rehab-2030/en.